Prosecutors have not helped the former Treasurer’s office to avoid arrest
As it became known “Kommersant”, the Tver court of Moscow arrested one more person involved in the case brought against management of a major construction company SU-155, the former financial Director of the company Sergey Murashko. He, like the CEO of the company Alexander Mescheryakov, charged in large fraud in the construction of residential complexes. The Prosecutor’s office, as in the case of the CEO, again spoke against the arrest of the defendant. The Supervisory authority has already appealed against in Moscow city court judgment.
In a criminal case of fraud with funds of property holders brought against representatives of the leadership of SU-155, there is another person involved — former financial Director of the company Sergey Murashko. He is already charged under part 4 of article 159 of the criminal code (fraud in especially large size), the Tver court of Moscow has satisfied the petition of GSU GU MVD in Moscow was arrested the former Treasurer’s office until October 10. His guilt, according to the Kommersant’s sources in law enforcement bodies, arrested Mr. Murashko does not recognize and testify refrains.
The plot of the charges brought against Mr. Murashko, told “Kommersant” his lawyer Vladimir Lyakhovsky, almost literally repeats the offense, previously imputed to the former head of SU-155 Alexander Mescheryakov. Recall that he was also earlier arrested by the Tver court of Moscow and the Moscow city court has already approved this decision.
Lyakhovsky the lawyer did not elaborate on the details shown to his client of the charges, but noted that the corresponding resolution of the investigation “is full of an incredible number of procedural errors”. “In my opinion, a consequence, apparently in a hurry,” suggested Mr. Lyakhovsky.
Note that the representative of the Metropolitan Prosecutor’s office in the Tver court, opposed the arrest of Mr. Murashko. The Supervisory authority considered that the detention in this case is “excessive measure.” In addition, the Supervisory authority insists on re-qualification of the actions of the person involved in this fraud to a much softer “attraction of money of citizens in violation of the requirements of the legislation of the Russian Federation” (article 200.3).