Political analysts Bashirov and Abzalov on Surkov's article: urged to negotiate with strong players Vladislav Surkov, in which he, in particular, wrote about the possibility of destabilizing the political situation in the country. This was reported by RIA Novosti.
Bashirov pointed out that the idea behind the article is that, in order to avoid internal shocks, “you should always look for options for moving this entropy to external contours.” p>
The essence of Surkov's article is that social entropy is always present, but in order for you to have a stable state, you need (…) like this entropy, it eventually crystallizes outside the borders of the state
Marat Bashirov, political scientist
Bashirov recalled that the “golden age of Putin's rule,” about which Surkov wrote, should be remembered and kept in mind, to study this experience so as not to repeat the 90s and that these principles, which now exist under President Putin, should continue to work for the good of Russia. ”
In turn, the president of the Center for Strategic Communications Dmitry Abzalov admits that today there is indeed an exacerbation, but it is far from the situation in the 1980s and 1990s. The political scientist noted that the world has changed a lot in 30-40 years. “The main thing is that people change with him. Especially people who are engaged in public administration, “he stressed, noting that the management system must adapt to changes in the world.
At the same time, both experts agreed that Surkov urged not to divide the world, but to learn to negotiate with strong players.
Surkov's article
On November 20, Vladislav Surkov published a column for “Actual Comments”, in which he declared the inevitability of the growth of chaos in any social system, regardless of the state system and rulers. He expressed the opinion that pushing such phenomena into a zone of silence, a kind of ideology of silence, threatens to repeat the situation in the 1980s and 1990s.
Surkov noted that at the beginning of the century, the new government managed to stop the unrestrained avalanche of social chaos, thanks to which Russia was in a state of stability for 20 years. However, the politician stressed, over time, due to the change in moods while maintaining “pinpoint loyalty and one-time patriotism,” the correct words become meaningless, the prevailing discourse becomes unconvincing and therefore more and more often needs force support. And, Surkov notes, until a certain moment, such a state does not threaten the authorities.
The use of extracts of historical memory, expired morality, administrative and spiritual values and other heavy social preservatives in unlimited doses ensures the preservation of the desired stability
Vladislav Surkov former aide to the President of Russia
However, he recalled that if the problem is ignored, then over time it destroys the existing order of things, which happened at the end of the life of the Soviet Union. For this, Surkov believes, the chaos must be taken out of the borders, as the United States is doing. At the same time, the politician does not deny the likelihood that in the near future several countries will collide in the world at once trying to endure their instability, among them the United States, China and Russia, and this will give rise to “destructive geopolitical storms”.
“Deserted democracy” and “i-imperialism” Related materials00: 02 – 23 August 2017 
So it turned out that Russia paid its debts for a quarter of a century00:04 – December 26, 2019 
New variables In 2019, the authorities in the countries of the former USSR were renewed. What do these changes mean for Russia?
In another article for his Topical Commentaries, Surkov suggested that by the end of the century, reforms and revolutions would lead to a restructuring of the world, resulting in a new system of global distribution of domination and subordination. The political scientist is sure that the next 100 years will become the times of the so-called i-imperialism and will be associated with the active division and “colonization” of cyberspace.
In addition, according to Surkov, the current conditions of digitalization and robotization of the political system will inevitably lead to the emergence of a high-tech form of state – deserted democracy. Surkov is confident that in the future the human factor will be less and less important – its role in the political process can be drastically reduced or completely eliminated for the sake of the efficiency of control systems – by analogy with a completely robotized deserted production in which human participation is not required at all. As a result, the political scientist believes, a technogenic state will emerge, in which “the hierarchy of machines and algorithms will pursue goals that are beyond the understanding of the people serving it.”