& laquo; Main problem & nbsp; & mdash; The United States and & nbsp; their & nbsp; NATO allies, neither & nbsp; under any guise, nor & nbsp; for & nbsp; whatever reasons & lt; & hellip; & gt; are not & nbsp; ready to meet our key requirements for & nbsp; non-expansion of NATO, the curtailment of the infrastructure of the alliance and & nbsp; its return to & nbsp; & nbsp; as of & nbsp; 1997. & nbsp; And, of course, on & nbsp; topics, which concerns the placement of legally binding systems of guarantees of non-placement & nbsp; ; close proximity to & nbsp; our borders & raquo;, & nbsp; & mdash; said the Deputy Minister.
Ryabkov noted that & nbsp; in & nbsp; in this case, I was not & nbsp; happy with the forecast that came true & nbsp; there were no surprises in the & nbsp; negotiations. “ This is exactly what we & nbsp; and & nbsp; have. But & nbsp; with the caveat that & nbsp; I definitely do not & nbsp; know what & nbsp; happened in the & nbsp; OSCE. It looks like there too & nbsp; everything is & nbsp; reasonably predictable & raquo;, & nbsp; & mdash; said & nbsp; he.
NATO position