Feldman was ordered to throw out the proposed General Plan of Yalta and develop new

Photo:

RIA Novosti

The head of the Republic of Crimea (RK) Sergey Aksenov instructed the architectural and town-planning Council to force developers of the General plan of Yalta to completely change the concept of the project. So he responded to the presentation of the General Plan chief architect RK Anna Tsareva, said on Thursday, June 1, “Criminals”.

It turned out that the current version of the General Plan of the main Crimean resort provides expansion of a high-rise building by reducing the health resort and Park areas. “The entire concept is to carry. It is not accepted. Designers give the task: to make a new master Plan from scratch. If he doesn’t want, you should look for a new designer,” said Feldman.

According to the head of region, the project should provide for the extension of the Park area and not residential development. “This Plan clearly should be thrown”, — concluded the head of the RK.

As noted by Tsarev, according to the current draft of the General Plan, health resorts and Park area be reduced to 122 ha. However, she promised that the order Aksenov on the revision of the General Plan “will be adopted and implemented,” adding that we should listen to the position of designers.

May 20 “Tape.ru” has published an article by experts of the Ranepa under the President of Russia Vladimir Komarov and Vladimir Kovel, dedicated to the presentation of the Yalta Plan. They criticized the draft, saying that if such a document is adopted, Yalta permanently lose the status of the resort. “The General plan scales the existing development approach, providing a multiple increase in residential development and anthropogenic pressures, reflecting in fact the interests of the construction business and their affiliated authorities,” warned researchers.

In 2016, experts Ranepa made by the developers of Strategy of development of the Big Yalta, which unanimously supported the decision at a public hearing. However, the Strategy does not lay down the basis for the draft General Plan.

Comments

comments