The forensic examination in the case of an accident in Balashikha found 45 gross errors
MOSCOW, 23 Aug — RIA Novosti. The medical examiner who examined the body of a little boy who died in the resonant accident in Balashikha, made 45 gross violations, in particular, incorrectly determined the cause of death of the child and incorrectly issued the examination, according to RT.
Resonant road accident has occurred in Balashikha April 23: a local resident driving a foreign car knocked down six year old boy. Initial examination revealed alcohol in the blood of the boy, and in the dose “to a strong degree of intoxication”. According to the publication, the examination was signed by head of Department is judicial-medical examination of the city’s Train “Bureau of forensic medical examination” of the Moscow region Mikhail Kleymenov.
“I don’t know what motivated the forensic scientist Mikhail Kleimenov, a signatory to the examination, but to call it objective, complete and accurate, definitely not” — are reported words of the source familiar with results of research expertise.
As it turned edition, the forensic scientist examining the body of a child, made 45 of gross violations, the physician has incorrectly determined the cause of the boy’s death, and the conclusion about the presence of alcohol in the blood was made without carrying out additional examinations, necessary in such cases.
According to the interlocutor of the edition, the examination was incorrect. For example, the expert did not indicate a commit time of decomposition and held a number of research that casts doubt on the objectivity of the expert studies. In addition, it is noted that were not investigated fully the heart, aorta, pancreas, spleen, pelvic bones, not a forensic histological examination of pieces of the internal organs, which is unacceptable.
In conclusion, it is noted that the experts had no right to conclude that before his death the boy was in a state of alcoholic intoxication, as such insights may be made only on the basis of a medical examination.
Studied conclusion, the specialists underline that the objectivity and completeness of the conclusion of the medical examiner is in doubt because the conclusions contradict the data specified in the research section.