Users complain to Google

Users complain to Google

Users of several mobile operators and Internet service providers complained about the blocking of access to the site google.ru at the request of Roskomnadzor.

In particular, the blocking of the site was described in the Telegram-channel”, Cybersecurity” political activist Alexander Litreyev. He speaks of many thousands of user complaints about the unavailability of the resource at a range of providers.

In Roskomnadzor the Russian service Bi-bi-si said that I can not yet comment on the incident.

Later, the head of Roskomnadzor Alexander Zharov confirmed “Vedomosti” that the lock is not false and the problem really was.

Google stood a redirect from the website of the betting company, so the operators started to block him. Google has removed a redirect, the problem was quickly solved, Zharova quoting “Vedomosti”.

Google confirmed that users experiencing problems with access to google.ru.

“We are aware that some users are experiencing problems with access to the site google.ru. On google’s side no technical problems. We deal with the situation,” — told Interfax in the press-service of the company.

Aware of the problems with access in a few dozen operators, including MTS. It is also reported that the website cannot be accessed through wifi the Moscow metro.

Google has also blocked a Moscow Internet service provider “AWACS”, the Agency reports RNS with reference to the company’s customers and its technical support. According to the representative of technical support, a lock connected with the decision of Roskomnadzor, which is made in the register of banned resources one of the IP addresses belonging to Google.

Numerous problems with access google.ru the Russian service Bi-bi-si said, and users of other providers.

In the registry of banned sites provided that the site www.google.ru was included in the “black list” in 2016.

Earlier it was reported about the vulnerability in the system to block sites of Roskomnadzor, which providers had limited access to the sites not included in the registry.

Comments

comments