Yabloko demands to check the Declaration Poklonskaya

Yabloko demands to check the Declaration Poklonskaya

The Deputy Natalia Poklonskaya clashed with several NGOs involved in anti-corruption theme. The Russian branch of Transparency International has promised to conduct its investigation against her. However, ahead of the Centre of anti-corruption policy of the party “Yabloko”. They have already sent a request to the Prosecutor and the state Duma with the requirement to check why the MP is not indicated in the Declaration data on incomes of the husband and the car.

The conflict of the Deputy Natalia Poklonskaya with working in the field of anti-corruption organizations, began last week. In an interview with RNS ex-the Prosecutor of the Crimea asked whether she believed organizations like Transparency International (TI) and the Foundation for fighting corruption Alexei Navalny and his allies. “Maybe it would not hurt to check for corruption. Because, as they say, the thief and the cap burns” — said in response to the MP.

This phrase has caused a reaction from the Deputy head TI Ilya Shumanov, who promised to do their own investigation against Poklonskaya. However, the first blow inflicted on it by another organization — the Center for anti-corruption policy of the party “Yabloko” (DAC).

When I heard about these of its invective, once asked colleagues from the DAC to check what kind of St. Matrona, we had that all around accused of mortal sins. Does she really such a sin?Sergei Microfinancial DAC “Apple”

According to him, the experts have indeed found information that raises questions about the reliability of the Declaration Poklonskaya published by the Deputy of the state Duma. Mitrokhin has already filed a statement to the Prosecutor’s office to verify this information.

Specialists of “Apple” are interested in the car and the husband Polonskaya, or rather the lack of them in the Declaration. On the Internet are two such instrument of MP. One, she filed as a candidate member of the lower house of the Parliament in 2015, second in 2016 while working in it.

In both declarations Poklonskaya stated its income and property of his minor child. In 2015, its revenue amounted to 2.3 million rubles, in 2016 — 2.6 million

None of the documents there is no information about her husband Polonskaya. However, experts DAC reference the interview where she says about it. In 2016, when Poklonskaya was a Prosecutor of the Crimea, TASS released in honor of her great material. “Now, according to the Prosecutor, to stay here no longer: less work, and the husband with a daughter waiting at home”, — stated in it. Note that MP mentions the presence of a spouse and in an interview with “Komsomolskaya Pravda” dated December 2016. “Rich suitors from Duma I the proposals received. I already said that I have a family — husband and beloved daughter,” said the former Prosecutor.

In DAC also suspect that the Organizers haven’t told about my car. The Internet is easy to find INN of the Deputy, while serving as her attorney. She is also the co-founder of the trade Union of workers of the Prosecutor’s office of the Republic of Crimea. The center checked out her number on an open basis for verification of contractors. The system displays the transport tax (penalty fees) are accrued in may of this year for possession of machine — 2.01 ruble. It is, of course, not the amount of debt and its availability. In the declarations Poklonskaya vehicles not listed. If it is still there, it means that the MP is wrong to have information about the property. Note that the service used by lawyers, “Apple” is not a state, although it has on its website reports on the support of the Federal Treasury and the Federal.

DAC experts themselves admit that they found all the facts can be quite a legitimate explanation. So, according to the Deputy head of DAC Alexei Karnaukhov, the car could simply forget to write. My husband Poklonskaya may not be married. However, this may be an attempt to hide their assets. In any case, according to the experts, hiding the name even if unofficial husband is not correct for public policy.

“From the point of view of public persona absurd and unethical to hide behind the protection of privacy. Publicity involves responsibility and openness as a guarantee of honesty. What Poklonskaya hides the name of a spouse — a bad sign,” — said Karnaukhov.

“Газета.Ru” tried to appeal to the most Poklonskaya, but for calls she didn’t answer. However, the assistant Deputy was able to transfer her questions about her official husband and the car and the request to explain their absence in the declarations. To directly answer them, the people’s darling did not, but gave the comment that “Газета.Ru” publish in full:

“Doubting the veracity of my Declaration can only say one thing — for all the information I answer before the law. Necessary documents and certificates, including the tax authorities, confirming my well-being was provided in accordance with the law in full. If, due to some reasons — political, personal, resentment, self-promotion, and so on — there is a desire to verify the accuracy of information, you should contact the competent authorities (law enforcement and control) or in the prescribed manner to the Chairman of the State Duma.

“Apple” is, in fact, did. According to the DAC, their appeal sent to the Prosecutor General and to the Duma.

Andrew Vinokurov