TFR asked to check the information about the illegal funding of Navalny

Roman Rubanov

State Duma Deputy from the party “United Russia” Dmitry Sablin appealed to the Investigative Committee of Russia (TFR) with a request to verify information that the Director based opposition activist Alexei Navalny Fund of struggle against corruption (FBK) Roman Rubanov illegally received 25 million rubles. On Friday, April 21, reports TASS.

The letter was sent to the head of the RCDS Alexander Bastrykin. In it the MP which is published on the portal InfoTrader information about that in 2014 and 2015 for 10 personal accounts Rubanova in the Bank schemes received funds: more than 12 million rubles in 2014, about 13.6 million rubles in 2015.

Sablin said that the money was transferred in rubles and in foreign currency, “and in dollars and euros, received a relatively large portion of funds”.

“And then he [Rubanov] transferred money to associates blogger Alexei Navalny,” — wrote the Deputy. Among them he calls Fund managers George Alborov Leonid Volkov.

“[Ask] to establish on what basis the Roman Rubanov received these funds and whether the taxes are paid with funds received by Rubanov and other fellow blogger Alexei Navalny,” asked the MP to the head of the TFR. If the information on these money transfers is confirmed, Sablin asks to check the Fund Navalny for violation of the law on NGOs.

April 16, journalist Oleg Lurie said that the Bulk of illegally received funds to conduct political activities from the former head of YUKOS Mikhail Khodorkovsky. He released copies of the documents from which it follows that the Trustees of Khodorkovsky handed over to the head of a staff of Navalny Leonid Volkov at least 60 thousand dollars under the guise of payment for the studies on “structure of contemporary Russian society.”

The law on undesirable foreign and international organizations signed in may 2015. He resolves to acknowledge the activities of relevant NGOs, threatening the foundations of the constitutional system of Russia, its defense capability or security, unwanted in the country.

Comments

comments