Attempts by the FBI to catch trump in relations with Russia has failed

Donald Trump

The Federal Bureau of investigation (FBI) found no evidence of an undeniable connection of the candidate in US presidents from Republican party, Donald trump with the Russian government. It is reported by The New York Times (NYT), citing its sources in the Department.

For much of the summer, the FBI conducted an extensive investigation in search of evidence of Russian influence on the presidential campaign in the United States. Agents are carefully investigated possible financial ties of the people around trump with Russian banks and financial institutions. However, found no direct or circumstantial evidence.

As specifies the edition, in the ongoing investigation also was not confirmed that a hacking attack on the servers of the Democratic party, which allegedly was Russia, was aimed at ensuring victory trump in the presidential election. According to the FBI, whose words cites the NYT, these hacks were made to disrupt the presidential campaign in General.

On October 31, the leader of the Democrats in the U.S. Senate Harry Reid said that the FBI has evidence that ties presidential candidate from the Republican party of Donald trump and his advisers with Russia and demanded to disclose this information.

Three days earlier it became known that the FBI resume the investigation of the leak of the official correspondence of Hillary Clinton. This message is very alarmed of the democratic candidate. “How strange to make such statements, providing very little information right before the election. Although not really only strange, but even unprecedented. This is deeply troubling,” she said, speaking to supporters in Daytona beach (Florida).

The scandal with e-mail, Clinton erupted in March 2015. It turned out that, during his tenure as Secretary of state, she kept up a correspondence via personal Inbox. Later, the politician gave the FBI emails, got on a private server to store e-mails, however, removed more than 30 thousand letters, stating that they were purely private in nature.

Comments

comments